Phd In Cognitive Psychology

Mission & Aims

Graduate students trained in Cognitive, Developmental, Social, or Quantitative Psychology follow a single curriculum with a uniform set of requirements, but their research programs and seminar courses focus on their unique areas of interest.

Our philosophy can be summed up as cooperative, and the small size of our program ensures individualized attention for all students. Although students work directly with a faculty advisor, following a mentor-apprentice model, they also have considerable freedom to collaborate with other faculty and students within and beyond the Department. Indeed, we encourage students to publish with several faculty members before they graduate. Greensboro’s central location in NC has resulted in close ties to other top departments, creating opportunities for our students to take courses, collaborate, and network.

Application Deadline:

December 1
A note on the GRE: This program does not require GRE scores as part of the admissions process. GRE scores will not be considered as part of our admissions decisions rubric.

Apply

Degree Requirements

student sits at desk in front of computer displaying brain scan

Recent graduates have secured postdoctoral and tenure-track positions:

Appalachian State University [Matt Meier]
Grand Valley State University [Sydney Garlitch]
Washington University in St. Louis [Matthew Welhaf]
Youngstown State University [David Frank]

Program Highlights

Individual attention and mentoring from faculty
Students have a primary faculty advisor but are also supported to conduct research projects with other faculty if it fits with their goals
Students typically receive 5 years of funding, including tuition remission
We’re a highly collaborative group, who not only enjoy “talking science” with each other but who also frequently conduct research together across laboratories
Methods training in experimental design, experience and thought sampling, protocol analysis, eye-tracking and pupillometry, and psychometrics
Recent graduate seminars in Variation in Executive Control, Cognition in the Classroom, Event Cognition, Cognitive Aging, Metacognition, Working Memory, Memory and Belief, and What’s the big idea? Competing perspectives on human cognition

View Faculty Members in Cognitive Psychology

Find a Faculty Mentor

SELECTED PUBLICATIONS
BY CURRENT/RECENT STUDENTS

Adams, R. L., & Delaney, P. F. (2022). Long-term working memory and language comprehension. In J. W. Schweitzer & Z. E. Wen (Eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Working Memory and Language (pp. 98-119). Cambridge University Press.

Garlitch, S. M., Richmond, L. L., Ball, B. H., & Wahlheim, C. N. (2023). Adult age differences in subjective context retrieval in dual-list free recall. Memory, 31, 218-233 (OSF Link)

Gilbert, L. T., Delaney, P. F., & Racsmány, M. (2023). People sometimes remember to forget: Strategic retrieval from the list before last enables directed forgetting of the most recent information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 49(6), 900–925. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0001178.

Hermann, M. M., Wahlheim, C. N., Alexander, T. R., & Zacks, J. M. (2021). The role of prior-event retrieval in encoding changed event features. Memory & Cognition, 49, 1387-1404.

Kemp, P. L., Alexander, T. A., & Wahlheim, C. N. (2022). Recalling fake news during real news corrections can impair or enhance memory updating: The role of recollection-based retrieval. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 7:85. (OSF Link).

Kemp, P. L., Loaiza, V. M., & Wahlheim, C. N. (2022). Fake news reminders and veracity labels differentially benefit memory and belief accuracy for news headlines. Scientific Reports, 12:21829. (OSF Link).

Smith, W. G., & Delaney, P. F. (2023). Updating and pre-existing semantic associations: Testing can enhance or impair new learning. Memory, 31(4), 530-544. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2023.2173784

Wahlheim, C. N., Smith, S. T., Garlitch, S. M., & Wiley, R. W. (2023). Interpolated retrieval retroactively increases recall and promotes cross-episode memory interdependence. Learning & Memory, 30, 151-163. https://doi.org/10.1101/lm.053782.123

Welhaf, M.S., & Kane, M.J. (2023). A nomothetic span approach to the construct validation of sustained attention consistency: Re-analyzing two latent-variable studies of performance variability and mind-wandering self-reports. Psychological Research.

Welhaf, M.S., Meier, M.E., Smeekens, B.A., Silvia, P.J., Kwapil, T.R., & Kane, M.J. (2022). A “Goldilocks Zone” for mind wandering reports? A secondary data analysis of how few thought probes are enough for reliable and valid measurement. Behavior Research Methods.